MENU

Hey, This Is an Emergency—Not Altruism’s Saturnalia

By Walter Donway

April 23, 2020

SUBSCRIBE TO SAVVY STREET (It's Free)

 

No single theme, no emotional message, now dominates our public life more than an unrestrained glorying in altruism—altruism triumphant, altruist cut free of constraint. This is the overwhelming public, media, and intellectual response in America to the tragedy of COVID-19. It is a saturnalia, an orgy of wild merry-making, and a black mass—a mockery of the American sense of life.

It is as though a long and frustrated yearning for a society of collectivism and sacrifice had burst from its underworld and gone racing and shouting.

As I write this, on NBC-TV is a show, “One World Together at Home,” a songfest of wailing, heartfelt lament of sorrow by aspiring musicians delighting in the spotlight. Now, Michelle Obama is introduced to tell us “We are all in this together.”  Now patients, attesting to the sorrow of “dying alone.” It is as though a long and frustrated yearning for a society of collectivism and sacrifice had burst from its underworld and gone racing and shouting—not through the streets but onto the TV screen.

An epidemic, certainly a pandemic, is a body-blow to any society, an emergency and a time for us to join in the task at hand: dealing with the emergency, getting back to normal. Getting back to where our individual lives, private interests, and chosen goals can be pursued. See “Tackling the Wuhan Pandemic without Wrecking the Economy.”

But this appropriate response to a genuine emergency does not imply glee in how the threat—but above all, the dictatorial edicts being justified by it—freeze the striving, achieving, competing market economy into stasis. Imply unbounded joy that all those selfish, striving, wealth-accumulating, “one percent” rich bastards are frozen in place. They finally are out of the picture. Now, all eyes are upon suffering, upon need, upon duty, upon sacrifice.

Altruism is the moral code that exalts self-sacrifice as the epicenter of human morality and nobility. Whether derived strictly from Christianity or more likely evolved from it and reinterpreted and reasserted in the Nineteenth Century by philosophers like Auguste Comte, altruism has dominated Western morality for much of the last two thousand years. When the dominance of faith has retreated before reason, science, individualism, and capitalism—as in the Age of Enlightenment and Age of Reason—altruism (and religion) have gone into decline. With that decline, cultural space has been created for the ethic of rational human self-interest, human flourishing, and human voluntary cooperation that have created unprecedented wealth in market economies.
 
Quote: “As I said, it’s almost funny: Everyone’s a socialist in a pandemic. But the laugh catches in your throat, because the only joke here is the sick one American society plays on workers every day.”

Need unlimited. Need as the sacred focus of “morality.”

But always, the lingering power of the altruist creed, religious or otherwise, has demanded that man’s “better nature,” “his higher instincts” be expressed in sacrifice of personal values, personal achievement, and personal happiness to—need. All need. Need worldwide.  Need unlimited. Need as the sacred focus of “morality.”

Quote: “This is as it should be. The baby boomers are the first wave of COVID-19’s Omaha Beach, flattening the curve so that if and when a second wave of the virus hits, the young can go on living. We will have done our duty and sacrificed for our country.”

Now, the coronavirus and COVID-19 illness have supplied the opportunity of literally a century to cast aside individualism (we are together, together, together), self-interest (it is “no longer about each of us,” no longer about “me”), and profiting from work (not essential, close it, stay home).

In a sense, the achievement of the mainstream media has been extraordinary, replacing hours of ordinary daily programming with endless images of suffering, helplessness, reproachful selfishness, and diktats of governors (stay home, wash your hands, wear your mask, and don’t touch your face). Yes, think about NOTHING but THIS. It is no small achievement to fill hours and hours of TV with a combination of warning, threats, appeals to altruism, and declarations of membership in a single suffering organism. Along with recurring performances of music that expresses the sacred creed of altruism.

And, as I write, the NBC special goes on, a virtual job fair for rappers, hip-hoppers, blues singers, and crooners crying to us of the tragedy of the human condition. Their faces distorted in expressive agony. Wailing sorrow. But, after all, hasn’t that been their theme since the 1960s? A “man of constant sorrow”? But only now, can we sit at home, as legally mandated, and contemplate constant sorrow all together, collectively.

The guy on the TV, with the Bob Dylan hair bomb and guitar, laments. The screen flashes to empty streets, solitary wanderers. But hey, what is new? Hasn’t that ALWAYS been their predominant sense of life?

It is only that now, by the good grace of COVID-19, that everybody is … well … more or less FORCED to listen.
 
Quote: “If ever there’s been a time for altruism and self-sacrifice, it’s now,” added Heather Cavanagh, president and CEO of the Stamford Chamber of Commerce.

Everything to keep us safe. How? Stay home. Close your business. Stop, for God’s sake, earning wealth and creating innovations and enjoying luxuries we cannot ever conceive. If Bernie Sanders fumed and ranted at the “one percent”—and only the naïve listened—now the one percent of America’s most productive can watch their wealth plunge almost daily to an extent literally unknown in America.

The long-frustrated dream of the altruists, the collectors of human sacrifices, are spread across the skies. All attention is upon a universe where man’s fate is to suffer.

And so, for a moment, the long-frustrated dream of the altruists, the collectors of human sacrifices, are spread across the skies. All attention is upon a universe where man’s fate is to suffer, all private and selfish activities are deemed “unessential,” and everywhere is the appeal to forget about yourself because we are all in this together.

What is astounding is that in this welcoming Petri dish of altruism and sacrifice there are thousands of personalities, faces, almost instantaneously on the air lecturing, singing, sighing, and sincerely testifying about the nobility of altruism—how this crisis will change us, how it will judge us, how (we hope?) things never will be the same. Nothing indeed can be as sweet to them as the sunrise of altruism.

I don’t know if it is true elsewhere, but in New York every moment of the day and night now must be filled with the “it.” My colleagues as far out as Australia say it is the same. “It” is what we love. We love the brotherhood, the organismal absorption, of shared suffering and sacrifice.
 
Quote: “The United States is an immensely wealthy nation, one of the richest in history. We can afford to sacrifice a substantial chunk of our gross domestic product to save a substantial number of lives. What better do we have to spend our money on?”

Already, we perceive the coming battle between those who would prolong the wonderful high of shared suffering and tragedy and those others who demand “get back to work.” Those who have gloried in the public spotlight, such as New York State Governor Andrew Cuomo, appearing for hours daily in the political opportunity of a lifetime, who already are assuming 18 more months of fun. And President Trump whose chief focus is to get us back to business, to normal, to life. He is cautious, certainly, but projects the priorities of a healthy man. There is no danger greater than to give up human initiative, production, and control in the face of fear. To fear to meet the imperative of production is a self-fulfilling prophecy of doom.

I do not minimize the danger and tragedy of this pandemic. I do not doubt the urgent imperatives of science in deciding next steps.

I do not minimize the danger and tragedy of this pandemic. I think of my son, who lives and works in New York City. I do not doubt the urgent imperatives of science in deciding next steps.

But I gradually have become annoyed, and then astonished, and now alarmed at the satisfaction, and the energetic celebration, and finally the blissful drugged high of our media, politicians, and celebrities at this saturnalia of self-imposed helplessness and altruistic triumph.

It would be preferable in the end to die of this honest illness than to lodge the enduring moral infection of altruism in the human spirit.

 

 

(Visited 414 times, 1 visits today)
   
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
15 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
CharlesRAnderson
CharlesRAnderson
4 years ago

One of the most insidious tactics of the altruists is to imply that individualism and Capitalism implies only competition and denies cooperation. Yet the first thing the altruist always works for is to limit the freedom of individuals to associate freely with one another to accomplish goals they have freely chosen. The freedom to cooperate is the first casualty of altruism.

Our great ability to respond to this pandemic with resources and technology to minimize its destruction is all the result of free individuals who have developed wealth, knowledge, and the appropriate technology in largely freely chosen cooperation with others. Yet all that has enabled an effective and rational response to the pandemic is under constant attack by these collectivist tyrants. When the Chinese Communist Party government of China failed its own people and all the peoples of the world, the WHO association of most of the world’s nations failed mankind, and the CDC and other government health organizations in the USA bungled their response to the pandemic, it has mostly been private hospitals, pharmaceutical companies, and other biomedical companies that have rallied and are addressing the pandemic most effectively. Under the light of reason, it should be apparent that it is altruism, collectivism, and illegitimate governments that have maximized the harm of this pandemic.

Calgacus
Calgacus
4 years ago

That’s a description of a weird alternate universe. In this one- China failed? Really? Ain’t much coronavirus there. Nor in the rest of the East – Taiwan, Korea, Japan – with a quick and vigorous government response. Capitalist heaven USA, Finance capitalist ruled Eurozone – pathetic response.
“Socialized medicine” works much better than private, capitalist medicine. It’s a fact obvious to anyone with a shred of scientific integrity. Lower resource input, superior outcomes. Superior response to crises. Amazing how people put their religious beliefs in Ayn Rand et al’s Holy Writ over their own survival. But people who would rather die than admit obvious facts staring in the face of everyone on the planet – facts that contradict their “free market” religion. Might do so. This piece should be in the running for a Darwin Award.

Mensch59
Mensch59
4 years ago
Reply to  Calgacus

I saw one of your comments on The Digger’s comments section but couldn’t reply to you there due to Hayes’ imperious censorship/being quick with the ban hammer.

The Green New Deal is a socialist program put forth by lefties and socialists. That’s what the documents and its history shows. It is the opposite of a capitalist profit-oriented program.

. My (pigeon-holing) understanding is that there’s confidence that the Green New Deal will be as effectively co-opted as Earth Day has been and as the entire environmental movement has been. It’s probably too depressing to believe, but I still recommend Jeff Gibbs’ “Planet Of The Humans”.

They had a comments section at WKOG that I think they got rid of as many people evinced their suspicion that WKOG was nothing but a Koch Brothers, fossil fuel financed scheme of agent provocateurs.

What about the Koch Brothers investing in “green energy”? You’d do well watching the film.

What I am still shocked by is how many people here [at the Digger] swallow WKOG’s insinuations and are completely trusting of these mysterious characters who seem hell bent on attacking anybody whatsoever who is doing anything to combat environmental problems or political oppression. Noam Chomsky, John Pilger etc are capitalist catspaws. Extinction Rebellion is Exxon. Yeah, right.

It’s a fundamentally different worldview with no overlap. (1) Capitalism and environmentalism can reverse this climate change caused mass extinction level event. (2) Capitalism — actually imperialistic rent seeking (but very few leftists are aware of the distinction between the capitalist socio-economic class and the rentier socio-economic class — is inherently destructive to local, regional, planetary ecosystems. The present political economy must be foundationally changed to protect the biosphere.
As your reading comprehension tells you, “no overlap.
This difference in worldview goes beyond governments and industry. The dominance of the rentier class is a parasite feeding on the entirety of living nature. This simply cannot be overstated. It’s not about how environmentalists are funded. Neither is it about how the political class allows the rulers to exploit the commoners. This is about the utter ruination of the commons and the commonwealth. See Michael Hudson’s 2015 book Killing the Host: How Financial Parasites and Debt Bondage Destroy the Global Economy, in which Hudson discusses how finance, insurance and real estate (the FIRE sector) have gained control of the global economy at the expense of industrial capitalism and governments. This is what WKOG is exposing and critiquing and analytically criticizing about the environmental movement (so-called) “green” capitalism, (so-called) “green” energy. It’s the exponential growth of the global economy which is killing living nature.

XR would gain a lot more street cred — but lose support of those who wish for “green” energy so that no consumer-lifestyle sacrifices are required — if their stated goal was to fundamentally change the foundations of the global economy away from capitalism. Without that end purpose, XR is about as world-changing as Noam Chomsky’s lesser evil voting strategy.

CharlesRAnderson
CharlesRAnderson
4 years ago
Reply to  Calgacus

Aside from the greater likelihood that the corona virus was released from a Chinese laboratory with inadequate safeguards than from the wet market they claim it came from, the Chinese Communist Party government did about all it could to hide the nature of the disease and its destructiveness from the rest of the world and they allowed continued air travel to the rest of the world from the infected region well after they shut down travel from there to the rest of China. Yes, China failed, as did its ally WHO.

You are right that Socialized medicine has a lower input of resources than does private, Capitalist medicine. Why would anyone put more resources into such an unproductive endeavor? Besides, there has always been the American private, Capitalist medical system to generate technological advances that the Socialized medicine areas of the world can get from us on the cheap.

I am not one to beg a government controlled medical system to provide me with medical care. Because of that, those of you who are advocating the use of force to make me contribute the hours of my life to your dictatorial system, and are trying to deprive me of voluntary alternatives, are actually trying to both rob me and kill me. I do not take that lightly. Socialized medicine is not just ineffective, it is the heart of evil. Each individual owns his own life and therefore should have the freedom to maintain it. Instead, you give us Death Panels of government bureaucrats.

Calgacus
Calgacus
4 years ago

This is the reverse of the truth. US style inferior capitalist medicine is about “death panels”, about robbing and killing. That’s what the facts show unequivocally. Americans, even rich Americans, pay more for the privilege of dying quicker. Well, nobody ever went broke by underestimating the intelligence of the American public.

Again, the religious devotion to a system that is robbing and killing both of us right now, is remarkable. Simply because the system which is manifestly superior in every possible way, far more productive, innovative and efficient too, is contrary to the Capitalist Religion. You may have the right to die for your beliefs, but how is it libertarian when your anti-factual beliefs are robbing and killing everyone else too? Fon’t people have the right to defend themselves from crackpot capitalist “medicine”.

So China “failed.” Whatever. Still did far better than the heartlands of corrupt capitalism. The US & Europe. A fact so inconvenient to the cult of capitalism that is must be ignored and thrown down the memory hole.

CharlesRAnderson
CharlesRAnderson
4 years ago
Reply to  Calgacus

The claim that I am robbing someone and killing someone when I am in fact doing nothing at all to them is absurd. I am not even preventing anyone from setting up a co-operative in which all of the voluntary members of the co-operative will provide for their medical care on a freely agreed upon basis among them. In fact, you are welcome to set up a co-operative according to your own vision, you just do not get to use force to make people join up. Go ahead and demonstrate the superiority of your system for providing medical care. If it were superior, people would have already set up such co-operatives and there would be no need for you to advocate forcing people to contribute the hours of their lives (commonly transferred into their earnings) to your agenda.

A major cost to American health care is that a large fraction of our spending is really foreign aid to the rest of the world. The life expectancy for the people of Western Europe, Canada, and the USA are all very close to one another. Many of the small differences that do exist are not the result of the respective medical systems. For instance, Americans are much more likely to die in traffic accidents, since we drive much greater distances than Western Europeans do. Americans are also much more likely to die as teenagers, with gang killings playing a major role in this. We may also have a higher military suicide rate due to our much greater involvement in world conflicts than other nations. Black Americans tend to die earlier also due to diabetes and cycle cell anemia, which again is not a function of our medical system. So, do not think you are going to get away with this old canard that our life expectancy is 1 or 2 years shorter than that in some other country that has socialized medicine. Actually, we do have a largely socialized medicine system as it is, but the remains of our private, Capitalist health care system is the strength of our remaining system.

Calgacus
Calgacus
4 years ago

Go ahead and demonstrate the superiority of your system for providing medical care. If it were superior, people would have already set up such co-operatives and there would be no need for you to advocate forcing people to contribute the hours of their lives (commonly transferred into their earnings) to your agenda.

Again, the whole world has done the experiment. The superiority of socialized medicine is clear to anyone sane. That’s what socialized medicine is – a great big national co-op. What the USA has and what you support is a corrupt co-op that forces everyone to contribute MORE hours of their lives than a “socialized medicine” system – to get inferior care, to live shorter and sicker lives.

All so that a tiny few corrupt creeps running it – crooks like Rick Scott say – can get a little richer. While such creeps are hard at work damaging socialized medical systems, no country has ever abandoned it to return to capitalist inferiorcare. The superiority is blindingly obvious. Basically nobody in the world ever agrees with you once they can see the experiment done in front of them.

Again, amazing passion for a parasite that is obviously shortening your life and everyone else’s.

CharlesRAnderson
CharlesRAnderson
4 years ago
Reply to  Calgacus

Amid the name-calling, I can only find one actual argument here. You say that no country with socialized medicine ever goes back. Since socialized medicine kills the institutions of private medicine and the medical entrepreneurs have to find other professions it is very hard to reconstitute a private medical system once it has been destroyed. What is more, a government-run medical system creates many special interests who are far more entrenched than any private medical institution could ever be, so there is a huge special interest lobby to keep socialized medicine in place. That lobby becomes very effective as propagandists and it is always remarkably easy to convince people that there is something wrong with the profit motive. Of course, in reality, the profit motive is just as much present in a government-run medical system, it just results in lots of high-paying jobs for government bureaucrats. And as mentioned before, the USA subsidizes the socialized medical systems around the world. So, the fact that socialized medical systems never, ever go back is actually a negative feature. It is like falling head first down a 100 foot long pipe straight into the Earth which is so narrow you can never turn around and climb back out. Socialized medicine not only deprives one of choices in medical care, it also deprives you of a reasonable path back to a patient-responsive private health care system.

We still have mandates to force the conversion of corn into ethanol, even though everyone now recognizes that the original arguments justifying that are all fallacious. This is an illustration of the power of government-created special interest groups and their lobbying ability.

Socialized medicine is a giant national co-op alright, but it is one in which everyone in a nation is forced to be a member. High quality medical care is eliminated and replaced by a lowest common denominator level of medical care. Choices are restricted. The system is not patient-responsive or even physician-responsive. Really good physicians stop practicing medicine. Care availability is restricted and wait times for care are extended, often with the result of deaths that would not have occurred in a market-based health care system. Not only do people come to the USA for quality care from all over the world, but they often have to come here to get timely care so they will not die. Yet you assert that socialized medicine shortens my life and everyone else’s. This makes no sense at all.

The private medical costs are driven upward by the fact that Medicare and Medicaid do not pay their fair share of the medical expenses of operating hospitals, clinics, and medical practices. Then there is the VA hospital system, which is a very good example of a totally government-run medical system. The VA system has well-recognized and major problems.

dmorista
dmorista
4 years ago

Ohhhhh my God!!! You are dredging up the old Sarah Palin disinformation meme of “death panels”. I got news for you, the U.S. tangled web of so-called health care uses twice the percentage of GDP, as the next most expensive system, but delivers poor to mediocre results. Every other advanced country has some system that provides health care to all of its citizens; the methods vary but the U.S. stands alone as a for-profit nightmare, and even then half the medical care is paid for by the government. And now, with the Covid-19 events for-profit healthcare has been exposed for the shambles that it actually is. We have death panels all right, they just are located in insurance company boardrooms where well-heeled executives deny people life-saving treatments to increase the rate of profit and their bonuses.

As for just how Covid-19 emerged, that is another question entirely. Maybe it leaked out the Wuhan Institute of Virology; maybe it jumped the species barrier at the Wet Market; and maybe it was introduced as a bioweapon by U.S. forces, who were there for the Military Games at just the right time to do just that. The U.S. has been losing the economic competition with China, losses fueled by American businesses that moved there to exploit low wage labor and improve their bottom lines. The crazed war-monger U.S. ruling class is a much better candidate for starting this than are the Chinese. Clearly the local Chinese officials intimidated and silenced the opthamologist who first noticed this disease, and the resulting time delay allowed something like 5 million people to enter and leave the Wuhan area thus ending any chance, however slim, of keeping this disease outbreak confined to that urban area. But who would say local American authorities would have reacted any better, though they would have probably just ignored the warnings or revoked the medical license of a physician who sounded an alarm. The treatment of “whistleblowers” by U.S. rulers shows how that works. But the Chinese Communist Party leadership, once they realized what was going on, took firm and decisive action and brought the disease outbreak under control in about 3 months. S. Korea, Japan, Taiwan, and Singapore have all done a better job than the pathetic and dangerously incompetent effort in the U.S.

As for capitalist medicine; over the last 2 decades the finance capitalists have imposed just-in-time practices on American health care. The reserves of the kinds of protective equipment, drugs, reagents, and devices like ventilators were stripped to the bone. Expenditures on public health were cut again and again. Profits are far more important than the lives of people who cannot afford the outlandish costs of medical care in the U.S. The U.S. has been exposed, yet again, as the Third World hellhole it has become for the majority of its inhabitants. A Third World state with a hugely expensive military that’s precisely what the U.S. has degenerated to.

CharlesRAnderson
CharlesRAnderson
4 years ago
Reply to  dmorista

As I already pointed out above, people put more into anything that delivers value to them. Since our healthcare system gives us better outcomes for the leading causes of death, we are willing to spend more money for that advanced healthcare. The rest of the world takes our knowledge and technology and rations it out parsimoniously through socialized medical systems. You fail to address the long waits for medical care for illnesses that too often kill people before a socialized medical system gets around to providing the patient with medical care. You fail to address the common choices such socialized medical system make in calculating the value of individual lives in terms of their age before committing resources, so scarce in such systems, to their care. Babies and the elderly are ignored and left to die. Yes,l that is an effective way to reduce the fraction of GDP spent on medical care, but it is not a choice I will make for a grandchild or my parents. Apparently, you have no problem with letting a bureaucrat make the decision to ignore them. In addition, we subsidize the world from that part of our own medical system that is not yet socialized by providing drugs to other countries at a fraction of the price we charge Americans and with medical training and with medical technology. In fact, a good part of my scientific work is supporting biomedical companies by helping them to solve materials problems and quality control for the technology they sell around the world.

You assert that “The crazed war-monger U.S. ruling class” is a more likely candidate for the release of the Wuhan coronavirus than the Chinese Communist Party government that has killed more of its own people than any government has killed in all of world history. Meanwhile, the U.S. has rushed about the world bringing aid to people all over suffering from natural disasters and all too often wars that we clearly had nothing to do with. I view your overall perspective as incredibly warped and exceedingly ready to sacrifice human lives, apparently for the god of Socialism. I do not seek a world in which everyone shares an equal poverty of wealth, knowledge, security, and pleasure. I want a world in which individuals are free to manage their own lives according to their own values. Individuals have a right to pursue their values, including the pursuit of wealth, knowledge, security, and pleasure. The first thing the socialists do is to place ever-tightening restrictions on this freedom to pursue individual goals. Doing so, they kill the possibility of fulfilling dreams and they doom us to severe unhappiness. There is a reason why the men of the USSR and of the Russian Federation have such short lives. They drink themselves to death in their extreme sorrow. This is what happens when you make a man’s life pointless.

dmorista
dmorista
4 years ago

This post is so full of distortions and lies that it is difficult to know where to begin. Let’s start with this doozy “There is a reason why the men of the USSR and of the Russian Federation have such short lives.” First you, probably intentionally, confuse the situation by mentioning the USSR and Russian Federation together, without discriminating between the two. The facts are, that the USSR had a life expectancy at birth for males and females, of 69.13 years in 1988, when U.S. combined life expectancy at birth was 74.77, China had a combined life expectancy at birth of 68.95 years, and the U.K. had a combined life expectancy at birth of 75.38 years.

It was after the collapse of the Soviet system, that the notable decline in life expectancy occurred. That was during the “shock therapy” period, when Neo-Liberals and Neo-Cons from the US swarmed into Russia to “advise” the Yeltsin Regime in its “transition to capitalism”; their role was to direct and lead the American Finance Capitalist looting of Russia. This process of looting and asset stripping was carried out in an alliance with internal Russian operatives, who seized control of most former state industries. It was this process that impoverished the middle classes and working class of Russia. The nadir of life expectancy was in the early 2000s, at 64.95 in 2003 according to one source I found and also at 64.95 in 2005 according to another. Both occurring during the “capitalist”, post Soviet Union period, of Russian history we might note. Putin’s rise to power, and his popularity among the majority of Russians, is based on his actions to ameliorate the horrific conditions that the American Neo-Con and Neo-Liberals managed to impose on Russia. (See, “Russia Life Expectancy 1950-2020”, MacroTrends, Graph of life expectancy 1950 – 2102, at : “Life expectancy (from birth) in Russia, from 1845 to 2020” Graph, Statistica, at : and “United States/Life expectancy (1988)”, Graph, at ). The absolute low point of Russian life expectancy since 1845, took place in 1945 at 23.6 years, that of course being the result of the Capitalist attack on the Soviet Union, carried outby Germany beginning in June of 1941. This figure was lower than even the dismal life expectancy figures from the 1800s, that were mostly around 29 years. Of course, the combined male and female life expectancy at birth figures for Russia, mask the massive decline in male life expectancy during the earl period of post-Soviet Capitalist Russia. That period registered the greatest fall ever measured, for a country not at war, down to something in the 55 year range.

Interestingly we now see a similar fall in life expectancy for working class White men in the U.S. now. The infamous “deaths of despair” effect, is largely found in the hollowed out and devastated formerly industrial regions of the U.S. Far more Americans now die of opiod overdoses, other health effects, and suicide annually, than died during the entire 10-year long S.E. Asian war period. Of course the pharmaceutical companies, that were well aware of the addictive nature of their formulation of Oxycontin, did not bother to change that formulation to a much less addictive one for several years, though they easily could have. The major company implicated so far, Purdue Pharma, has declared bankruptcy; it is still owned by a wealthy family, the Sacklers, who have already hidden their massive assets, This pertinent members of this wealthy family, and their minions in the high level managerial class at the company, should be prosecuted for hundreds of thousands of murder charges; and sentenced to serve their time in the worst and most violent institutions of our massive prison Gulag system. Of course, that is a grim fate that only awaits poor people in the U.S., the rich and well-connected are “above the law”. A poor person is sent to prison for trivial often victimless crimes, while the rich commit massive trillion dollar crimes and scams with impunity. (See, “The family behind OxyContin pocketed $10.7 billion from Purdue Pharma. Meet the Sacklers, who built their $13 billion fortune off the controversial opioid.”, Mar 23, 2020 Katie Warren and Taylor Nicole Rogers, Business Insider, at : and “Sacklers Withdrew Nearly $11 Billion From Purdue As Opioid Crisis Mounted”, Dec 17, 2019, Colin Byer, NPR, at : “Where did the Sacklers move cash from their opioid maker?”, September 2, 2019, Adam Geller, Times of israel, at )

And, of course, you state your personal version of the standard right-wing Capitalist disinformation meme that “… the Chinese Communist Party government that has killed more of its own people than any government has killed in all of world history.” This is s standard talking point of the right and is not supported by any serious scholarship, though of course there are U.S. scholars, with patrons among the most virulent far-right billionaires who write their screeds about China. I do not have any illusions about China, they are the emerging Global Hegemon, in the process of replacing the fading U.S. But let’s compare the trajectories of China, that emerged in 1949 from a century of subjugation to colonial powers, chaos, civil war, and rule by warlords. In the 71 years since the triumph of the Revolutionary forces, after a decades long civil war and invasion by Japan, China has become a modern nation. It now has the largest network of high-speed rail in the world and many other modern accoutrements; including the largest middle class on Earth. Greedy American and European capitalists moved their industrial operations to China to use the cheap labor making a fortune for themselves and their stockholders, while devastating the lives of working people in the U.S. and other western societies. The Chinese used this investment to move up the developmental ladder to become a modern high-tech society. I’ve visited China and it is a very impressive place, sort of like the U.S. was back when it was in the process of replacing the British Empire as the Global Hegemon. Faced with a choice between loans to finance Chinese built infrastructure, versus vicious terror attacks and bombing campaigns by the U.S. military, mercenary forces, allies, and proxy forces; the choice is clear for most developing countries. At least with the Chinese they get the infrastructure, whatever the terms of the loans.

For developing countries that interact with the U.S., they get their cities turned into rubble fields, their societies shattered, and their people slaughtered in complex and murky civil wars and religiously manipulated death squad campaigns. It is worth noting that the attack on Afghanistan was largely motivated by the desire to control the opium poppy fields there, that had replaced the previous operations in the “Golden Triangle” region of SE Asia. The U.S. has either attacked, or supported allies or proxies that attacked 6 other countries in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA), those being Iraq, Syria, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, and Yemen; and there is growing hostility between the U.S. and both Iran in the MENA region, and closer to home Venezuela. Meanwhile, the American populace is left with Trillions of dollars of debt, a growing police state, and a shattered and ever more hollowed out socioeconomic order.

There are numerous reports of as many as 400 U.S. bioweapons labs, the majority of which have been established in various countries ringing Russia, Iran, and China. The U.S. used biological weapons against N. Korea and in various attacks on Cuba (the U.S. covert action agencies and their allies among the Cuban Gusanos in the U.S. have conducted some 7,000 attacks of various kinds on Cuba since 1959). Of course, the U.S. ruling class has a problem. After over 40 years, of attacking the prosperity of the working and middle classes here, the majority of hard science graduate students in the U.S. are foreigners, many of them Chinese. There was considerable movement of virologists between the U.S. and China in the years before this Covid-19 outbreak. Francis Boyle of the University of Illinois, who wrote the Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act of 1989, is of the opinion that Covid-19 leaked from the Wuhan Institute of Virology. He is also of the opinion that Lyme Disease and West Nile Virus leaked from the U.S. bioweapons research laboratory at Plum Island. Imagine the response of the U.S. rulers if China established dozens of bioweapons laboratories and production facilities in Canada, Mexico, Cuba, Jamaica, Guatemala, the Virgin Islands, and the Bahamas. (See, “The Pentagon Bio-weapons”, June 14, 2019, Dilyana Gaytandzhieva, Arms Watch, at : “Biological Weapons: A Useful and Timely Factual Overview: Part I”, February 07, 2020, Larry Romanoff, Global Research, at : “COVID-19 and the CIA’s Biological Warfare on Cuba”, March 15, 2020, Timothy Alexander Guzman, Silent Crow News, at : and “Francis Boyle: Wuhan Coronavirus is an Offensive…”, Interview of Francis Boyle, episode 131, Geopolitics and Empire, at ).

Finally, there is your absurd contention that “… we subsidize the world … by providing drugs to other countries at a fraction of the price we charge Americans and with medical training and with medical technology.”. The reason that American Big Pharma companies cannot charge the high prices they charge to Americans is that the various E.U. Countries and the E.U. itself have passed legislation controlling the prices that companies can charge for pharmaceuticals. Whatever its faults, the E.U., and its constituent states, refuse to allow the price gouging that Americans are saddled with. Certainly, the hollowed out and nearly disembowled U.S., was recently revealed as no longer being capable of producing the basic medical equipment needed in Covid-19 treatments. As for Medical training, Cuba provides absolutely free MD and other medical training for African-Americans who pledge to work in the disadvantaged minority communities in the U.S. And during the Ebola Crisis in 2014 the Cubans provided more help than did the immensely richer U.S. did. In addition Cuba “… after the devastating earthquake in impoverished Haiti (in 2010, dm), Cuba sent the largest medical contingent and cared for 40% of the victims. In the aftermath of the Kashmir earthquake of 2005, Cuba sent 2,400 medical workers to Pakistan and treated more than 70% of those affected; they also left behind 32 field hospitals and donated a thousand medical scholarships. … There are now 50,000 Cuban doctors and nurses working in 60 developing countries. … Cuban doctors have carried out 3m free eye operations in 33 countries, mostly in Latin America and the Caribbean, and largely funded by revolutionary Venezuela. That’s how Mario Teran, the Bolivian sergeant who killed Che Guevara on CIA orders in 1967, had his sight restored 40 years later by Cuban doctors in an operation paid for by Venezuela in the radical Bolivia of Evo Morales.” (See, “Cuba’s extraordinary global medical record shames the US blockade”, Dec 3, 2014, Seumas Milne, The Guardian, at )

Mike N
4 years ago

I urgently recommend the book “The Ominous Parallels” by Leonard Peikoff. He shows in depth how the NAZIs preached the real meaning of sacrifice to the German people and how self destructive it was to the entire nation.

Bruno Dangerfield
Bruno Dangerfield
4 years ago
Reply to  Mike N

Read, “The Stones Cry Out – a Cambodian Childhood” for another chilling real-life example. As the children were starved while building roads with their little shovels and pails the Khmer Rouge would tell them how important it was for them to sacrifice for the betterment of their society. Then, when they finally died, the KR would get off their horses just long enough to through the emaciated little corpse out into the swamp.

Most powerful book I’ve ever read. No longer in print, by the way…

Bruno Dangerfield
Bruno Dangerfield
4 years ago

“There is no danger greater than to give up human initiative, production, and control in the face of fear.” I like this line, and it makes me think… Are these a greater danger than giving up basic freedom? It’s left out, so I ask. What happens when they point a gun to your head or remove your right to travel unless you take a vaccine that’s only been through phase 1 trials? That will be a time of reflection for all of us…

test