A cargo cult is a belief system of a primitive society wherein superstitious rituals bring in modern goods.<\/p>\n

Newly elected Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez recently said<\/a> that Modern Monetary Theory (MMT) absolutely needed to be “a larger part of our conversation.” Her comment shines a spotlight on MMT. So what is it? According to Wikipedia<\/a>, it is:<\/p>\n

\u201cA macroeconomic theory that describes the currency as a public monopoly and unemployment as the evidence that a currency monopolist is restricting the supply of the financial assets needed to pay taxes and satisfy savings desires.\u201d<\/p>\n

It is uncontroversial to say that the Federal Reserve has a monopoly on the dollar. So let\u2019s look at the second proposition. Unemployment, MMT holds, is evidence that the supply of dollars is restricted.<\/p>\n

In other words, more money causes more employment!<\/em><\/p>\n

This does not sound very different from what the New Keynesians say. I analyzed former Fed Chair Janet Yellen\u2019s seminal paper on the economics of labor for Forbes<\/a>:<\/p>\n

\u201cHere is their [Yellen and co-author Ackerloff] tenuous chain of logic:<\/p>\n

\n
1. Disgruntled employees don\u2019t work hard, and may even sabotage machinery.<\/li>\n
2. So companies must overpay to keep them from slacking.<\/li>\n
3. Higher pay per worker means fewer workers, because companies have a finite budget.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

   Yellen concludes\u2014you guessed it:<\/p>\n

   \n
   1. Inflation provides corporations with more money to hire more people.\u201d<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

      MMT is referred to as neo-Chartalism, and there is some evidence that Keynes was influenced by Chartalism.<\/p>\n

      As a footnote, MMT is referred to as neo-Chartalism, and there is some evidence that Keynes was influenced by Chartalism<\/a> (which goes back to at least 1905).<\/p>\n

      On Thursday, Marketplace published a piece on MMT<\/a>. Things are heating up for this hot new (old) idea. Marketplace presented a \u201cbathroom sink\u201d model of the economy (yes, really!).<\/p>\n

      To wrap your brain around this concept, picture a bathroom sink. Think of the government and its ability to create more money whenever it needs to as the faucet and that bucket area of the sink where the water goes, as the economy.<\/p>\n

      The government controls how much money, or water, is flowing into the economy. It spends money into the economy by building interstate highways or paying farm subsidies or funding programs.<\/p>\n

      \u201cAnd so as those dollars reach the economy, they begin to fill up that bucket, and what you want to do is be very mindful about how full that bucket is getting or you’re going to get an inflation problem,\u201d Bernie Sanders\u2019s economic advisor Stephanie Kelton said.<\/p>\n

      Inflation is where the sink overflows. If that happens, Kelton said there are two ways to fix it: \u201cYou can slow the flow of dollars coming into that bucket. That means the government then has to start slowing it’s [sic] rate of spending, or you can open up the drain and let some of those dollars out of the economy. And that’s what we do when we collect taxes.\u201d<\/p>\n

      This sounds a lot like the Quantity Theory of Money (QTM). This view often paints a picture of pouring water into a container. The higher the water level, the higher the general price level.<\/p>\n

      QTM by itself does not promote the idea that more money causes more employment. Only that more money causes more rising prices. But Keynes did. And the New Keynesians like Yellen do.<\/p>\n

      So what makes MMT unique?<\/p>\n

      According to Stephanie Kelton, in the Marketplace article:<\/p>\n

      \u201cIf you control your own currency and you have bills that are coming due, it means you can always afford to pay the bills on time,\u201d Kelton said. \u201cYou can never go broke, you can never be forced into bankruptcy. You’re nothing like a household.\u201d<\/p>\n

      Keynes advocated government deficits to bolster employment and to respond to a crisis. MMT takes this to the next level. The voters want free goodies.<\/p>\n

      Keynes advocated government deficits to bolster employment and to respond to a crisis. MMT takes this to the next level. The voters want free goodies. Traditional economics says \u201cthere ain\u2019t no such thing as a free lunch.\u201d<\/p>\n

      MMT says \u201coh, yes, there is!\u201d<\/p>\n

      At least until you get to too much inflation<\/em>. The Monetarists would agree, don\u2019t print too much money or you get too much inflation<\/em>. Much of the gold community also agrees. If you print too much money, then you get skyrocketing inflation<\/em>.<\/p>\n

      Never mind that this prediction was proven wrong in the post-2008 policy response. We want to highlight that the Keyesians, the Monetarists, the MMTers, and even many Austrians largely agree. The problem with too much money<\/em> printing is too much inflation<\/em>. They quibble about what is too much, but they agree on the \u201cbathroom sink\u201d model of the economy.<\/p>\n

      In the words of early 20^{th<\/sup> century physicist Wolfgang Pauli, QTM \u201cis not even wrong<\/strong>.\u201d<\/p>\n}

      We define inflation as the counterfeiting of credit. That is, fraudulently taking money from a saver. It is called borrowing<\/em>, but the borrower<\/em> hasn\u2019t got the means or intent to repay. Additionally, when everyone thinks that the government\u2019s debt paper is money<\/em>, the saver doesn\u2019t even know or consent to the borrowing.<\/p>\n

      There are lies, damn lies, and statistics. Then there are a few pugnacious, in your face, gaslighting make-you-believe-in-unreality cargo cults. We will explore this in full, below.<\/p>\n

      During World War II, the U.S. military set up operations on certain Pacific islands. They built landing strips, where they landed planes bringing in supplies and men. They hired the local tribesmen as laborers, and paid them stuff that was ordinary to Americans, but wondrous to the islanders. Like canned food. The islanders really looked forward to when a plane would land, and they would get some cargo.<\/p>\n

      After the war, the US military pulled up stakes and left. But the islanders still wanted the cargos. So they set up these elaborate charades, with tiki torches instead of flashlights, and coconut-shell mock-up headphones. They went through the motions that they thought the Americans did. To try to bring back the cargos.<\/p>\n

      Huh. What does that remind you of? An elaborate charade, with bogus props, going through the motions of a civilization they don\u2019t understand to try to produce desired results\u2014free goodies.<\/p>\n

      Modern Monetary Theory is a cargo cult.<\/p>\n

      It\u2019s ironic that the name includes the word modern<\/em>. If we said that a pile of greasy rags sealed in a dark closet would spontaneously generate rats, would you call that a modern<\/em> theory? If we said that sickness is caused by bad humors, and the cure is bloodletting by leaches, would you say this is modern<\/em>? How about the idea that the sun and the planets orbit Earth. Is this modern<\/em>, too?<\/p>\n

      Not only are these not modern\u2014they are, in fact, old ideas that were tossed into the garbage heap\u2014they are not theories either. A theory is an explanation of reality, which integrates many observed facts and contradicts none.<\/p>\n

      Even a child understands something. Even people in the ancient world understood it, too. If you lend a bushel of wheat to your neighbor, and he does not repay it, you suffer a loss. You are worse off, compared to before. And so is the borrower (who at the least ruins his credit).<\/p>\n

      MMT is based on denying this universal truth. Common sense says that if Peter lends to Paul, and Paul does not repay, then Peter is impoverished. Common sense says that Peter would not lend to Paul if he knew that Paul would renege on his obligation.<\/p>\n

      MMT says that a modern<\/em> economy has a modern<\/em> currency, which is just the state\u2019s paper. And in a modern<\/em> economy, the modern<\/em> state can print more with no concerns other than \u201coverflowing the bathroom sink.\u201d Get that, the only concern is prices could rise too fast. And so long as this does not occur, then the state can get away with it. Only, there is nothing to get away with. It\u2019s perfectly fine.<\/p>\n

      In a cargo cult, the people did not recognize the difference between fake coconut shell headphones, and real headphones. Or flashlights and tiki torches. So they made crude copies as best they could. They went through the motions to summon the sky gods to come down to earth, with cargo.<\/p>\n

      Let\u2019s look at the mental gymnastics. They imbued magical\u2014that is outside the principle of cause and effect\u2014characteristics to their props. Failing to understand that airplanes are created by men, and that it takes a great deal of planning (not to mention wealth) to fly a plane full of cargo from America to the middle of the Pacific, they imagined that, somehow, the act of using the headphones and the flashlights caused the plane and its cargo to come. The headset is tokenized, viewed as a magical talisman.<\/p>\n

      What a cargo cult does to headphones, MMT does to money. First, the cargo cult substitutes coconut shells held together with twisted vine for headphones. What they wear when attempting to summon the sky gods is not a headset, but a surrogate. MMT (as does Keynesianism and Monetarism) substitutes government debt paper for money.<\/p>\n

      As an aside, even a gold-redeemable certificate is not money. Think about it. You can bring this piece of paper to the teller window. You push it across the counter. The teller pushes back the gold coin. If the word for the paper is money, then what is the word for the gold for which it redeems?<\/p>\n

      Anyway, modern monetary systems use irredeemable paper. It\u2019s not gold-redeemable, but even worse. And they treat this paper as if it were money<\/em>.<\/p>\n

      And it goes even farther. Previous theories felt the need to at least pay lip service to repaying debt. They couldn\u2019t quite get to the point of openly admitting that the debt is never to be repaid. Keynes famously quipped that, \u201cIn the long run, we are all dead,\u201d creating ambiguity about the intention to repay. Monetarists generally promote the idea that if the economy grows fast enough, the debt will shrink as a proportion of GDP.<\/p>\n

      The Keynesians don\u2019t have the intention to repay. And the Monetarists don\u2019t look at Marginal Productivity of Debt<\/a>, which would show them that their idea isn\u2019t working. But they don\u2019t go as far as the MMTers.<\/p>\n

      MMT says that the government is unlike deadbeat-debtor Paul. There is no need for the government to repay. Ever. It\u2019s the same as the cargo cult.<\/p>\n

      MMT says that the government is unlike deadbeat-debtor Paul. There is no need for the government to repay. Ever. It\u2019s the same as the cargo cult. The cargo cult has no concept for capital. The islanders do not produce in excess of what they consume, accumulating tools and technology to increase their productivity. They subsist, and assume that this is how the world works.<\/p>\n

      MMT has no concept for capital either. It puts blinders on, declaring that consumer prices are the only thing to measure. The only risk is if they rise too fast. And the MMTers refuse to see anything else.<\/p>\n

      In our discussion of Yield Purchasing Power<\/a>, we introduced a farmer who sells off the back 40 (acres), chops down the apple orchard to sell the fruitwood, tears down the old barn to sell the planks, and even dismantles the tractor. And why does he do this? He gets cash in exchange. And the cash is far in excess of his crop yield. Why struggle and sweat to produce $20,000 a year by growing food, when you can sell off the piece of the farm for $20,000,000.<\/p>\n

      The monetary system incentivizes the farmer to trade productive capital for paper credit slips. The incentive is that this paper has a greater purchasing power<\/em> than what he can earn by operating the farm. He can trade his farm for far more groceries, than the food he could grow on it.<\/p>\n

      This is the same old game. But MMT gives it a new name\u2014and asserts a bolder defense. MMTers don\u2019t want to see, and they want you not to see, that the lender gives up good capital but the borrower is just consuming it. MMT justifies the naked consumption of capital.<\/p>\n

      Modern Monetary Theory is neither modern<\/em> nor a theory<\/em>.<\/p>\n

      MMT is not an attempt to explain reality, but to deny<\/strong> it.<\/p>\n

       <\/p>\n

       <\/p>\n

       <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

      A cargo cult is a belief system of a primitive society wherein superstitious rituals bring in modern goods.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":30,"featured_media":5627,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_topic_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_reply_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,9],"tags":[529,101,488,207,656],"class_list":["post-5628","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-commerce","category-politics","tag-austrian-economics","tag-economics","tag-finance","tag-inflation","tag-mmt"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/thesavvystreet.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5628","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/thesavvystreet.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/thesavvystreet.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thesavvystreet.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/30"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thesavvystreet.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5628"}],"version-history":[{"count":7,"href":"https:\/\/thesavvystreet.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5628\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":5635,"href":"https:\/\/thesavvystreet.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5628\/revisions\/5635"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thesavvystreet.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/5627"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/thesavvystreet.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5628"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thesavvystreet.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5628"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thesavvystreet.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5628"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}